ENG 445: Shakespeare
Measure for Measure

Course Information

Discussion: Measure for Measure as a "Problem Play"

In past exercises we've explored the genres of comedy and tragedy. Measure for Measure is technically classified as a comedy in the table of contents of the First Folio. However, it is widely regarded by comtemporary critics as a problem play--that is, a comedy that subverts some key characteristics of comedy. In this exercise, we'll explore what it means to be a problem play and analyze characteristics of this drama.

Part 1. Review

  1. List characteristics of comedy that we have discussed previously:
  2. List characteristics of tragedy that we have discussed previously:
  3. Identify key elements of Measure for Measure that fit in these categories

Part 2. Analysis

Based on your classification of characteristics, explain the ways in which Measure for Measure fits these two dramatic genres. Why do you think Measure for Measure is best described as a "problem play"?

Discussion Topics

  1. Group A: Describe the character of Angelo: consider both what he says about himself and what others say about him. What is the difference between reputation and identity and what is the significance of each?
  2. Group B: Issues of illicit sex are the most prominent "crimes" that are addressed in the play. Identify the main sex/morality crimes in the first two acts and analyze their importance. How does this square with the Duke (as Friar)'s solution of using women's bodies to effect what he thinks of as justice later in the play? Analyze and explain.
  3. Group C: Identify and describe the forms of deception and disguise that are featured in this part of the play. How are these deceptions/disguises significant? How do they relate to authority?
  4. Group D: Describe the social rehabilitation of the bawd Pompey. What is the meaning or significance of this strange apprenticeship? What does it suggest about the values of the society Shakespeare depicts?
  5. Group A: and Group C: The intractable Barnadine refuses to "prepare" for death: what does this subplot suggest about the connection of religion/morality to social code? About justice (think of the final outcome, too)? About the relationship of the state to the individual and the limits of state authority?
  6. Group B: and Group D: Discuss the representation of religion in the play. Focus in particular on the scene at the convent and the characters of Isabella, the Friar (real and the Duke when he is performing specifically religious functions) and Angelo.
  7. All: Discuss the ending of the play: are the Duke's actions just (why/why not?)? Do the punishments fit the crime? What about Isabella's silence? What is suggested about the social institution of marriage?

Background

Dating and Texts of the Play

Measure for Measure was probably written in 1603-04 and was performed at court for King James I (who had come to power in 1603 after the death of Elizabeth I) on December 26, 1604. It was a play produced as a part of Christmas festivities (Bevington 404).

Measure for Measure was first printed in the First Folio in 1623, and this version is the standard for modern editions of the play (Mowat and Werstine li).

Shakespeare's Sources

Shakespeare's chief sources for this play were George Whetstone's tragicomedy Promos and Cassandra (1578) and Heptameron of Civil Discourses (1582), Giovanni Cinthio's Hecatommithi (1565) (Bevington 406).

Important Themes

Measure for Measure is technically a comedy, but rather than the death free-ending (only ambivalently "happy"), the most generically comic characteristic is the chaotic universe portrayed. This play is about society far more than romance, and justice is the thematic cornerstone. Measure for Measure asks the reader/viewer to think about the relationships between law and justice, between law and the lawgiver, between the letter and the spirit of the law, and between civil law and religious solace.

These issues are worked out against a backdrop of other concerns, such as the power of the aristocracy and the clergy. The character of the Duke, who gives up his aristocratic role to take on the religious mantle as a disguise is an excellent representation of both social positions of power. His actions raise questions about the proper scope of civil and religious authority; the Duke uses his disguise to the utmost as well, including performing religious rites as though he had the authority, which complicates the issue of religious power and role--only clergy could have had the sort of freedom of movement and automatic trust the Duke enjoyed, and these attributes alone allow the Duke the sort of control over the final outcome that he exercises.

The character of Angelo is equally fraught--he is also deceptive, but the disguise he hides behind is his reputation. Reputation, or the social persona that is constructed by the individual and the interpretation of society, is the main battle ground of this play: it is Angelo's most powerful weapon and greatest vulnerability.

Isabella is one of Shakespeare's most famous heroines, and she is a complex character who not only raises issues generally about the role and status of women, but about religion and law. One of the most commented upon moments of the play is the ending, where Isabella, at the last, does not act as she did throughout the play, but is acted upon. Her silence in the final scene generates space for widely varied interpretations of the Duke's proposal.

Images of the body and of disease, images that invoke or describe the senses, and images of duality or disguise (the "fantastical duke of dark corners" (IV.iii)) are some of the most common and most important in the play--not only figuratively, but literally as well. Language as a social medium is also a main concern, and this can be seen in the low comic plot in the character of Elbow as well as in the more deliberate utterances of Angelo and Isabella.

Works Consulted

Bevington, David. The Complete Works of Shakespeare, 4th ed. New York: Longman, 1997. Pp. 404-406.

Mowat, Barbara A. and Paul Werstine. "An Introduction to this Text." Measure for Measure. New York: Washington Square Press, 1997. Pp. li-liv.