ENG 354: Technology and Culture
Spring 2021

Syllabus

general information | description and objectives | policies | assignments and grading | required texts

general information

Semester: Spring 2021
Time and Location: M 6:00-8:30p, MAH 208
Department: English
Credit Hours: 3 Semester Hours
Prerequisites: ENG 101
General Education/ Core Curriculum: N/A
Learning Outcomes: IIC, IIF, VD
Program Learning Outcomes English 3, 7, 10; DMS 2, 3
Instructor: Dr. Susan Shelangoskie
Office: St. Agnes Hall (SAH) 164
Phone: (419) 517-8904
Email: sshelangoskie@lourdes.edu
Office Hours: by appointment on Zoom
Course Website: Canvas: login with Lourdes email id and password

description and objectives

i. course description

In this course, students explore the connection between technology and culture, engaging with historical perspectives from the nineteenth-century emergence of the digital age through the dominance of Internet technology today. In addition to this historical and theoretical framing of technology and culture, students will analyze various types of narrative as the vehicle for framing and transmission of technical structures and conventions to the public sphere.

ii. purpose of the course

This course teaches students to analyze the consequences of the rise of the digital and information age through examination of the recursive relationship between technology and culture. Student examine the function of literary, narrative, popular, and technical discourse in promoting the development of technology. This course is ideal for students who are preparing for graduate school, entering their profession after graduation, or who are interested in learning more about digital technology.

iii. learning outcomes

By the end of this course, students should be able to:

IIC. Review existing knowledge and synthesize it in original ways to clarify meaning, develop a broader perspective, or present a new point of view.

IIF. Express ideas effectively in speech and in writing to inform, engage, and persuade their audiences.

VD. Recognize contextual frameworks, such as cultural, historical, professional, and ethical frameworks, in responding to issues or situations and addressing contemporary problems.

iv. program learning outcomes

By the end of this course, students should be able to:

English Program:

3. synthesize ideas and information among multiple primary literary texts and among primary texts and other period resources and/or secondary theoretical and critical resources, to develop analytical arguments

7. apply sound principles of rhetoric, grammar, and style in writing analytical, persuasive, and scholarly papers and other types of writing

10. master fundamental skills of technical, professional writing, media writing, and/or writing pedagogy.

Digital and Media Studies Program:

DMS2. employ design techniques and digital technologies to create verbal and visual arguments

DMS3. analyze and evaluate interactions between technology and culture

v. course objectives

By the end of this course, students should be able to:

1. synthesize information/theory about the historical development of digital technologies, and apply these ideas to current digital technologies through original analysis. (VB, VD, 3, DMS3)

2. analyze connections between technology development and cultural discourse. (IIC, 3, DMS3)

3. evaluate the role of narrative in various media as a means of transmitting technical discourse to the popular sphere. (7, VD, DMS2, DMS3)

policies

1. Spring 2021 COVID-19 Policies

Personal Protection:

All individuals must wear a face covering in classrooms at all times. Masks should cover both nose and mouth. For additional information, see the LU COVID policy. Students who do not have a mask will be asked to leave the classroom until they have an appropriate face covering. See the LU COVID policy for a list of locations on campus where free masks can be obtained. If you have a mask exemption from the Office of Accessibility, be sure to communicate with your instructor about this as soon as possible.

All individuals are expected to follow social distancing guidelines as defined in the policy. Sharing items such as pens and paper is not recommended. There will be no food or beverages allowed in the classroom. Failure to abide by these policies will result in the student being asked to leave the classroom immediately.

Students will disinfect high-touch points in their workspace before/after class.

Each classroom will be equipped with a spray bottle of disinfectant and a roll of paper towels for this purpose. Environmental Services staff will thoroughly clean and disinfect classrooms following industry best practices each night. The ES Staff will refill disinfectant bottles and replenish paper towels each night as required.

Student Absences:

In the event that a student absence is based on COVID 19, the student is required to reach out to a member of the COVID 19 assessment team. Team member contacts are listed in the exposure/potential exposure protocol in the Fall 2020 Start Plan at 2020-Fall-Start-Plan-STUDENT-FAMILY.pdf (lourdes.edu). Once a COVID 19 assessment team member is contacted by the student, a COVID 19 assessment team member (typically the Dean of Student Success) will send official notification of the absence and connect the student and faculty via email. Once connected, the student is responsible for communicating with his/her course faculty regarding missed assignments or exams. The format and timing of the completion of these items will be at the discretion of the course faculty. It is possible that a student may have multiple absences due to complications that may arise from COVID 19. Under those circumstances, the student should work proactively with the instructor to complete the coursework in an agreed upon timeline. NOTE: A student absence is excused ONLY after an instructor receives notification from a member of the COVID 19 assessment team.

COVID 19 Assessment Team Contact Info:

Instructor Absences:

In the event that the course instructor is absent due to COVID-19, students should check Canvas and their Lourdes email for information on how to proceed. Students are responsible for checking their Lourdes email and Canvas announcements for any class information.

2. Policy on Emergency Response:

In case of a Tornado, I will direct you to the nearest shelter in accordance with Lourdes University's Policy for Tornado Warnings and Tornado Warning Procedures. The nearest shelter for this course is in the Ebeid Hall Basement. In case of a fire, I will help direct you to the nearest exit. Please evacuate in a calm and efficient manner. Do not use the elevator. Do not block building entrances once you are out.

3. Statement on Disabilities:

Persons with Disabilities: If you have a documented disability and need to arrange academic adjustments, please contact the Office of Accessibility Services at oas@lourdes.edu or 419-824-3523.

If you have a documented disability and have already been assigned academic adjustments by the Office of Accessibility Services, please discuss them with me so that we can implement them appropriately.

If you will require assistance in the event of an emergency, please discuss with me your needs on the first day of class so that we can plan accordingly. The Emergency Evacuation Procedure for Persons with Disabilities is available at: http://www.lourdes.edu/campus-life/accessibility/emergency-evacuation-procedures-for-persons-with-disabilities/

4. Academic Honesty:

Students are expected to do their own work and avoid plagiarism in any form. Turning in others' work or failing to cite source material properly will result in a zero on the assignment and may result in an F for the course. Please see the student handbook for more information (available on-line at: https://www.lourdes.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-19-Academic-Catalog.pdf, page 85). If you are uncertain about how to properly cite your sources, contact me for assistance (before the assignment is due).

A goal of Lourdes University is to engage students in an honest and dynamic search for truth. Academic honesty is a hallmark of such a quest. Accordingly, students are expected and encouraged to engage in all aspects of their academic studies in an honest and ethical manner. Should instances of academic dishonesty arise, the following policies and procedures will be in force.

I. Definition:
Academic dishonesty is unethical behavior, which in any way violates the standards of scholarly conduct. It includes such behaviors as cheating on assignments or examinations, plagiarizing, submitting the same or essentially the same papers for more than one course without the consent of all instructors concerned, misappropriating library materials, or the destroying of or tampering with computer files. Also included in academic dishonesty is knowingly or intentionally helping another to violate any part of this policy. Plagiarism is defined as presenting someone else's work/ideas as one's own such as submitting a paper written by someone else, failing to give credit to sources (books, articles, websites, and interview sources) in research papers, verbatim use of quoted (must have quotation marks or indentation), paraphrased, or summarized material without appropriate source citation and bibliographic attribution. It is the policy of this academic community to invoke sanctions against students who violate these standards of academic honesty or who engage in academically dishonest behavior.

II. Sanctions:
Faculty members who suspect a student of academic dishonesty may resolve the problem directly with the student. In cases where culpability is substantiated or admitted, the sanction may include failure of the course as well as other sanctions up to and including suspension or expulsion from the University. When a student is sanctioned, the faculty member must report the incident in writing to that faculty members' Department Chairperson. A copy of the report will be sent to the Dean of the College and the Provost. A student who has been sanctioned for more than one incident of academic dishonesty may receive additional sanctions as deemed appropriate by the Provost, including, but not limited to, suspension or dismissal from Lourdes University.

III. Appeals Procedure:
The student has five (5) working days after notification of the sanction to appeal to the instructor. The instructor has five (5) working days to render a decision on the appeal. If unsatisfied, the student has five (5) working days after notification of the instructor's decision to appeal the sanction to the instructor's Department Chair. The Department Chair has five (5) working days to render a decision on the appeal. If still unsatisfied, the student has five (5) working days after the notification of the Chair's decision to appeal the sanction to the Dean of the faculty member's college. The Dean has five (5) working days to render a decision. If still unsatisfied, the student has five (5) working days after the notification of the Dean's decision to appeal the sanction to the Provost. The Provost has five (5) working days to render a decision, which is final. All steps of the appeal and responses must be in writing. If any deadline for a decision on the appeal is unmet, with the exception of that by the provost, the student may make the appeal to the next person in the process.

5. Statement on Academic Grievance:

final course grade is only subject to review when 1) a procedural error has been discovered in the calculation or recording of a grade, or 2) there is a basis or need for an academic reevaluation. Students are always encouraged to attempt to resolve issues directly with the member of the faculty, staff, or administration involved in an informal manner. If a student wishes to have a final grade reconsidered, the student must meet with the instructor and attempt to resolve the difference. If the issue is not resolved, a Final Grade Grievance Form may be obtained from the University web site. The student must use the form to describe the problem in writing and the reason(s) the grade should be changed. The student will then obtain a signature from the instructor to show that they have met to discuss the issues in the grievance. At this point, the student must return with the form to the Executive Assistant to the Provost (SCH 141) to have it dated and recorded. This date marks the official beginning of the grievance.

The Final Grade Grievance Form must be presented and signed at each of the subsequent selected appeal steps. The grievance procedure must begin within 15 business days of the beginning of the spring semester for grades received during the fall semester, and within 15 business day of the beginning of the fall semester for grades received during the spring or summer session. Please refer to the Lourdes University Catalog for other important deadlines and details of the policy.

6. Attendance:

Class participation is vital in this course; in-class work is a necessary supplement to the reading and writing you will do outside of class, and the contributions of each individual in class are important to everyone's learning. Therefore, attendance is required. In the event of illness or emergency, please contact the instructor (before class if possible) to obtain an excused absence. Unexcused absences during the term will affect your course grade. You are responsible for the information discussed in class when you are absent. In-class assignments/quizzes may not be made up for credit if your absence is unexcused.

7. Classroom Decorum:

Please be respectful of others' learning and avoid disruptive behavior. Turn off cell phone ringers and all other distracting portable electronic devices/sounds before class. Do not listen to headphones or ear buds during class. You should not be engaged in on-line activities such as texting or social media during class time. If there is a situation where these activities are more important than classroom learning, please leave the room to conduct your online/cellphone communications and return when you are able to focus on and participate in our classroom discussion.

8. Email Policy:

Assignments should be submitted in class or in Canvas/online as directed. You are welcome and encouraged to contact me through email if you have questions or otherwise need assistance. Please use your Lourdes email for these communications. In addition, University policy stipulates that course information (such as feedback and grades) may not be sent to a student's non-Lourdes email account.

9. Recording Policy:

Lourdes University prohibits the use of tape-recorders, video cameras, cell phones, and all other devices by students to record class lectures or meetings with the instructor or any staff member unless they have expressed written consent of the professor or staff member. Before recording any lecture, a student who wishes to record a lecture must sign a Lourdes University Agreement Form and present this to the instructor for written consent. Once students have signed the Lourdes University Agreement Form and have the expressed written consent of the instructor to record a class or meeting, students must make their own arrangements to record the class, and all other class members must be informed that the class is being recorded. Please see the Student Handbook for more on this policy.

assignments and grading

You will be assessed on assignments on a 300 point scale as indicated below. Click here for assignment descriptions.

List of Assignments and Point Values
assignment percentage points
participation* 3% 10 pts
in-class exercises #1-10 35% 10 x 10 pts each = 100 pts
blog posts #1-6 20% 6 x 10 pts each = 60 pts
presentations #1-3 10% 3 x 10 pts each = 30 pts
topic and work plan 3% 10 pts
design plan 3% 10 pts
annotated bibliography 3% 10 pts
draft 3% 10 pts
final project 20% 60 pts
Total: 100% 300 pts

*Participation includes attendance, preparedness to discuss reading assignments, class discussion exercises, and oral presentations assigned at the discretion of the instructor. By attending each class, students earn half of the participation points for the course. The remaining points are based on students' in-class contributions. Violating the Classroom Decorum policy above can negatively affect your participation grade.

Grade Scale
Letter
Grade
Percentage
A 94-100
A- 90-93
B+ 87-89
B 83-86
B- 80-82
C+ 77-79
C 73-76
C- 70-72
D+ 67-69
D 63-66
D- 60-62
F 0-59

Grades on late homework and essays will be dropped 5% for each calendar day late and will not be accepted more than 7 days late. If you are having trouble with an assignment, you should make an appointment with me for assistance and to discuss the possibility of a (no-penalty) extension before the paper is due. Late final papers cannot be accepted because of the registrar's final grade deadline.

required texts

online texts available in Canvas

Biagioli, Mario. "Before and After Photoshop: Recursive Fraud in the Age of Digital Reproducibility." Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 58, no. 46, 2019, pp. 16334–35. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.lc.opal-libraries.org/doi/epdf/10.1002/anie.201908646, Wiley Online Library, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201908646.

Buranyi, Stephen. "Rise of the Racist Robots – How AI Is Learning All Our Worst Impulses." The Guardian, 8 Aug. 2017.

Churchill, L.A. "Playing with Fire." Lightning Flashes and Electric Dashes: A Volume of Choice Telegraphic Literature, Humor, Fun, Wit & Wisdom, edited by W. J. Johnson, W.J. Johnston Publisher, 1882, pp. 69–71.

Coulson, Mark, and Christopher J. Ferguson. "The Influence of Digital Games on Aggression and Violent Crime." The Video Game Debate, edited by Rachel Kowert and Thorsten Quandt, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 54–73.

Dale, Gillian, and C. Shawn Green. "Video Games and Cognitive Performance." The Video Game Debate, edited by Rachel Kowert and Thorsten Quandt, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 131–52.

"The Government and the Telegraphs." London Daily News, 29 Jan. 1870, p. 2. British Newspaper Archive.

Griffiths, Mark D. "Gaming Addiction and Internet Gaming Disorder." The Video Game Debate, edited by Rachel Kowert and Thorsten Quandt, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 74–89.

Hall, Stuart. "The Whites of Their Eyes: Racist Ideologies and the Media." Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Critical Reader, edited by Gail Dines and Jean M. Humez, Fourth Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014, pp. 90–92.

Head, Francis Bond. Stokers and Pokers: Or, The London and North Western Railway, the Electric Telegraph and the Railway Clearing House. A. M. Kelley, 1849.

Hornung, E. W. "A Spoilt Negative." Belgravia, vol. 65, Mar. 1888, pp. 76–89.

Ivory, James. "A Brief History of Video Games." The Video Game Debate, edited by Rachel Kowert and Thorsten Quandt, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 1–21.

Kowert, Rachel. "Social Outcomes: Online Game Play, Social Currency, and Social Ability." The Video Game Debate, edited by Rachel Kowert and Thorsten Quandt, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 94–115.

Lipschultz, Jeremy Harris. Social Media Communication. 2nd Edition, Routledge, 2017.

Louw, Eric, and Nicholas Carah. Media & Society: Production, Content & Participation. Sage, 2015.

Lynskey, Dorian. "'Alexa, Are You Invading My Privacy?' – the Dark Side of Our Voice Assistants." The Guardian, 9 Oct. 2019.

Markoff, John. "How Many Computers to Identify a Cat? 16,000." The New York Times, 25 June 2012. NYTimes.com.

Marwick, Alice, and Danah Boyd. "To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Parctice on Twitter." Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Critical Reader, edited by Gail Dines and Jean M. Humez, Fourth Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014, pp. 525–35.

Morley, Nick. "Everything You Need to Know about Ad Fraud." The Drum, 8 Apr. 2020.

Pacey, Arnold. "The Culture of Technology." Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, edited by David M. Kaplan, 2nd ed, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009, pp. 95–102.

"The Romance of a Telegraph Wire." Strand Magazine, vol. 3, Jan. 1892, pp. 202–05.

Schildhauer, Thomas, and Hilger Voss. "Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing in the Sciences." Opening Science. Accessed 29 Dec. 2020.

Shelangoskie, Susan. "Anthony Trollope and the Social Discourse of Telegraphy after Nationalisation." Journal of Victorian Culture, vol. 14, 2009, pp. 72–93.

---. "Rethinking Propriety in the Age of Instantaneous Photography: E. W. Hornung's Camera Fiend." Victorian Literature and Culture, 2020/11/19 ed., vol. 48, no. 4, Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 721–44. Cambridge Core, Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/S1060150319000196.

Slack, Jennifer Daryl, and J. Macgregor Wise. "Luddism." Culture and Technology: A Primer, 2nd Edition, Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, 2014, pp. 68–72.

"Spirit Photographs." The St. James's Chronicle, 3 Feb. 1863, p. 7. British Newspaper Archive.

"Spirit Photographs." The Tewkesbury Register, and Agricultural Gazette, 22 May 1869, p. 4. British Newspaper Archive.

Vincent, James. "Twitter Taught Microsoft's AI Chatbot to Be a Racist Asshole in Less than a Day." The Verge, 24 Mar. 2016.

Yamaoka-Enkerlin, Anna. "Disrupting Disinformation: Deepfakes and the Law." New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, vol. 22, no. 3, New York University School of Law, Apr. 2020, pp. 725–49.

videos available through the course website

Absolute History. A Trip to the Moon - the 1902 Science Fiction Film by Georges Méliès. 2016. YouTube.

AustinMcConnell. This Short Film Is Written Entirely By AI. 2019. YouTube.

BBC. How the Obama / Jordan Peele DEEPFAKE Actually Works | Ian Hislop’s Fake News. 2019. YouTube.

BFI. The X Rays (1897). 2010. YouTube.

BuzzFeedVideo. You Won’t Believe What Obama Says In This Video! 😉. 2018. YouTube.

CornellCCSL. AI vs. AI. Two Chatbots Talking to Each Other. 2011. YouTube.

Lourdes ENG CBE. ENG 354: Unit 2--Crowdsourcing for the Public Good. 2021. YouTube.

NBC News. Deep Fakes: How They're Made And How They Can Be Detected. 2018. YouTube.

Vox. Crowdfunding, Explained by Exploding Kittens. 2017. YouTube.

---. How Ads Follow You around the Internet. 2020. YouTube.

---. How Does the Internet Work? - Glad You Asked S1. 2020. YouTube.

---. How Job Surveillance Is Changing Trucking in America. 2017. YouTube.

---. How Smart Is Today's Artificial Intelligence? 2017. YouTube.

---. The First Movie with CGI. 2019. YouTube.

---. Was This Famous War Photo Staged? Feat. Errol Morris. 2020. YouTube.

---. Why Advertisers Are Tracking Your Emojis 😱. 2018. YouTube.

---. Why Coronavirus Scammers Can Send Fake Emails from the WHO. 2020. YouTube.

---. Why Movies Went from 15 Minutes to 2 Hours. 2019. YouTube.

---. Why You Keep Using Facebook, Even If You Hate It. 2018. YouTube.